About Me

Name: Mike Whipple
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

Blog Roll

 

What is Really Real?

Posted by Mike Whipple on Thursday, August 13, 2009 7:47:39 AM
The recent Homeland Security report on the growing threat of "right wing" groups turns out to be based on web searches of "right wing" sites. See the Fox News video here: http://bit.ly/tLu1N No intelligence gathering, no analysis, just looking at web sites. Now a new "news" article is making its way around DrudgeReport and other sites. An article produced by Southern Poverty Law Center www.splcenter.org  and getting play on DrudgeReport, claiming a recent rise in "militias" is also based on a rise in websites according to the report itself which was written by a staffer at the left wing group but presents itself as a "study".

The real question is, are these sites indicative of more persons or groups or just more people learning to use the internet? Maybe a better question is that if we are going to count websites as proof that some heinous danger lurks in the hinterland, who is creating the websites? Maybe leftist groups are ginning them up to promote their agenda of hate. The duplicity would be right out of the leftist play book so revered by the radicals, Saul Alinsky. In an article in the American Thinker today  http://bit.ly/xTUdb   Kyle-Anne Shiver writes of a story from the Alinsky biography by Sanford D. Horwitt which demonstrates the deception of the left. "From Horwitt's Let Them Call Me Rebel:
 

"...in the spring of 1972, at Tulane University...students asked Alinsky to help plan a protest of a scheduled speech by George H. W. Bush, then U.S. representative to the United Nations - a speech likely to include a defense of the Nixon administration's Vietnam War policies.  The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush's address.  That's the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative - and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school.  He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, ‘The KKK supports Bush.'  And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results.""
 
How easy it is for leftist techies to create a "surge" in militias or right wing extremist groups when all they have to do is buy a few domain names and fill the free hosted sites with what they imagine is the universe of hate on the right. Conservatives are a little too trusting when it comes to the left. As a more generally trustworthy bunch who believe in absolutes like honesty, conservatives forget that leftists don't have moral values. All morality is relative to a leftist. The end therefore justifies the means. We have to look no further than the constant duplicity coming from the current leftist administration to see that this is indeed the case.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SayitaintSotomayor is Obama's Sista Solja in the Revolution

Posted by Mike Whipple on Friday, July 31, 2009 11:22:37 AM
According to an article posted by Tom Tancredo on Townhall.com http://bit.ly/mpONa Sotomayor has ties to extremist group La Raza that wants the Southwest US as part of Mexico. This is only one more useless factoid. The Democrats have the votes even without Lefty Lindsey Graham.

Much like the Obama campaign disclosures the facts don't matter. The racism, the hypocrisy, the shredding of the constitution, all were warned about Obama. Many of us even tried to convince voters of the importance of supreme court picks even if you believed there was no other reason to vote for McCain. Obama was very clear what he wanted in a supreme court justice- empathy with minorities. If Obama ignores the rule of law in so many other places ( GM, Chrysler; AIG bailouts; Honduras; Americorps IG firing, etc.) why should he be expected to pick a jurist that cares about the law? Much like the media bias that used to be denied and is now openly embraced as justified, the leftist oligarchy has come out of the closet. The bright side of SayitaintSotomayor is that it shines the light on the left's passion to destroy the constitution.
 
In a Center for a Just Society article "President Obama and the Politics of Class Envy" http://bit.ly/3wjO25  Monte Kuligowski writes "In one of his moments of political candor in 2001, Obama revealed his view of the U.S. Constitution as having "deep flaws," while lamenting, "[The Supreme Court] never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and sort of more basic issues of political and economic justice in this society. And to that extent as radical as I think people tried to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, as least as it's been interpreted...."".

Did you get that? Obama wants the court to "break free" from the "constraints" of the constitution. With SayitaintSotomayor he has found his sista solja.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AARP VP Denies Leftist Bias - Reality Check

Posted by Mike Whipple on Friday, July 31, 2009 10:28:32 AM
Kerry campaigner and Democrat activist since 2003 AARP VP Drew Nannis denies leftist bias in an article http://bit.ly/TAggi in the Washington Examiner yesterday. Nannis is a leftist political veteran. He worked for Rep. Marion Berry (D-Ark.) in 2003, served as communications director for Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.), prior to becoming the press secretary for Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo) in 2006. He is quoted as saying "I would’ve rather Kerry won than the Red Sox" about his campaign efforts during the world series even though he is a native of Boston.

I have long observed the left wing slant of AARP positions and have refused to join because of them. This latest support for Obamacare and its callous treatment of seniors has awakened many of its members to the truth. Not only is the AARP supporting a government run Canadian style health plan, but they are saying nothing about the end of life coercion, the denial of treatment for seniors and the rationing it will lead to. They don't question the population control freaks in the Obama administration that will have a hand in determining who gets to live. The AARP website has an extensive apologetics article supporting all of Obama'a claims about the healthcare bill that he didn't know anything about.
 
In other policy abuses of seniors, AARP magazine published an article http://www.aarpmagazine.org//global_meltdown.html in 2007 promoting the climate myth and trying to convince seniors that global warming is their "issue of legacy". Why aren't they standing up for fixed income seniors who will be bludgeoned by the climate tax bill?
 
As long as AARP leadership has political activists like Nannis, politics will matter more than members.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Who's Your Omama

Posted by Mike Whipple on Sunday, September 28, 2008 2:00:00 PM
Obama's appeal is to be our provider. $1,000 to you if you'll vote Omama. Of course he has to steal it from oil companies first (think how your 401k portfolio will do when Omama starts taking corporate profits). Free health care if you vote Omama. Just like Cuba. We have only to look at other countries who have socialized health care to see what a disater that is. What's next a free car? Billions more tax dollars for energy
   As a community organizer in Chicago Omama hlped dole out $100,000,000 (that's right a hundred million dollars) thta was supposed to improve education. most of that money was funneled through Bill Ayers' (the unrepentent terrorist) organization. Was education improved? No, just the propaganda in education. Ayers wants to instill "activism" in your school children. read that propagandize your children with his (and Omama's) beliefs.
   Similarly Omama supported the bailout bill while it had almost $100,000,000 (did I get enough zeros there? 100 MILLION dollars) to be doled out to a left wing community activist group called ACORN (see Michellemalkin.com for her extensive research) which is guilty of voter fraud (helping Dems) embezzlement, and misuses of taxpayer funds according to James Terry of the Consumer Rights League. Show me the money!!!
   And.... while Omama is out there villifying Wall Street no one asks him about being at the top of the list of funds received from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In 2006 John McCain warned the Senate about the dire consequences of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and tried to get the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005 which he co-sponsered, (S. 190) passed to prevent just the type of bailout we are now paying for. Who opposed reigning in Fannie and Freddie regulation? Omama, Hilliary, Kerry and Dodd the top four recipients of Fannie and Feddie campaign funding.
   It is frightening that so many appear to be lemmings following Omama over the cliff while he is on the take from the very entities he so ardently bashes on the campaign trail. But wait1 We don't care about that! We want change! Change in our pockets. If Omama will give me mine who cares if he gets his.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obortion

Posted by Mike Whipple on Sunday, September 28, 2008 2:00:00 PM
It is easy to see why abortion is a non-issue in this campaign. It is the elephant in the room no one wants to talk about. McCain, although pro life spoke at the Clinton Global Propaganda Initiative and attempted to touch heart strings by decrying the "nearly three thousand children are lost every day just to this one affliction" (malaria). Yet no one speaks for the three thousand plus american children killed every day by abortion. McCain wants to give our money to save African children from malaria but our congress gives millions of our dollars to pro abortion groups like Planned Parenthood to kill american children. While the African-american population is about 18% of America, 56% of the children killed to abortion are African-american. It seems like Planned Parenthood is fullfilling its founding legacy of racial purification. And who are the biggest advocates of Planned Parenthood at the abortion industry? You guessed it Obama, Hillary and the Dems.
   But there is an even nastier new trend in abortion rights and that is Obortion, the killing of live babies after they have survived an abortion attempt. It used to called infanticide. Obama makes it a right so we should name it after him. How can so many people seek to elect such a person? Obama said doesn't want his girls "punished" by having a baby. Maybe he should tell them where babies come from.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »